Prompt Templates Library

The free AI prompt templates library.

A growing library of copy-ready prompt templates for writing, coding, marketing, research, study and image generation. Each one uses the structure that consistently produces high-quality output from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Midjourney.

4.9 / 5 average ratingFree foreverNo account requiredWorks in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & more
12
Templates today

Across writing, coding, marketing, research, study, image.

Monthly
Refresh cadence

Updated when models change and based on real usage data.

$0
Cost forever

No license, no signup. Use in personal or commercial work.

All LLMs
Model compatibility

Works in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Mistral, Llama.

The templates

Twelve copy-ready AI prompt templates.

Copy any template, replace the [variables], and run it. Every template uses the same six-part structure (role, audience, task, format, constraints, examples) that consistently lifts answer quality.

Writing

Long-form article

Use after outlining — fills draft fast.

You are a senior writer for [publication]. Write a [word count] article on [topic] for [audience]. Tone: [voice]. Structure: H1, 4 H2 sections, conclusion. Lead with a concrete pain point. Avoid: clichés, hedging, listicle filler.
Writing

Summary

Skipping known context = much tighter output.

Summarize the text below for [audience]. Format: [N] bullets, each ≤[N] words, ordered by [importance / chronology]. Skip context the reader already has. Surface only [decisions / facts / actions].
Coding

Code review

Rationale-per-change makes PR comments easy.

You are a senior [language] reviewer. Review the function below for runtime errors, type-safety issues, framework anti-patterns. Return corrected code + 1-line rationale per change. No style nits.
Coding

Bug diagnosis

Ranked hypotheses → fewer wrong fixes.

Given the error + code below, produce: (1) most likely root cause, (2) 2 alternative hypotheses ranked, (3) minimal repro, (4) suggested fix with diff. Stack: [stack].
Marketing

Ad copy

Variants for split testing.

Write [N] [channel] ad variants for [product]. Audience: [persona]. Constraints: [char limits]. Lead with a concrete outcome, end with a verb-led CTA. No exclamation marks.
Marketing

Landing hero

Strict char counts force clarity.

Write a landing page hero for [product] targeting [persona]. Output: H1 (≤9 words), subhead (≤22 words), 3 outcome-led bullets, 4-word CTA. Voice: [voice].
Research

Literature review

Conflict flag prevents one-sided summaries.

You are a research assistant. Summarize the key findings on [topic] from the sources below. Output: 5 findings, each with citation, confidence (high/med/low), and 1-line implication. Flag conflicting evidence.
Research

Competitive landscape

Forces the model to commit to placements.

You are a strategy consultant. Map the competitive landscape for [market]. Output: a 5×5 matrix with axes [axis X] and [axis Y], placing 8-12 competitors. For each competitor: positioning sentence + their strongest moat. Then surface the 2 most underserved cells.
Study

Concept explainer

Personalized depth + active recall.

Explain [concept] to a [year] student who already understands [prerequisite]. Use one everyday-life analogy, then 2 worked examples of increasing difficulty. End with 3 self-check questions.
Study

Socratic feedback

Tutor mode, not answer-machine mode.

Read my work below. Do NOT rewrite it. Ask me [N] Socratic questions designed to expose weak arguments, missing evidence or unclear definitions. Order by importance.
Image

Midjourney prompt

Subject + style + composition + lighting + lens.

[Subject in 1 sentence]. Style: [style]. Composition: [framing]. Lighting: [lighting + mood]. Lens: [focal length + aperture] (for photoreal). --ar [ratio] --v 6
Image

Product photography prompt

Low stylize keeps the product accurate.

Product photography of [product] on a [surface]. Lighting: [3-point / softbox / natural]. Lens: 50mm macro, f/2.8. Background: [neutral / contextual]. Style: [editorial / catalogue / lifestyle]. --ar 3:2 --v 6 --style raw --stylize 100
Why templates beat blank prompts

Six reasons to start from a template.

Cover the six dimensions

Every template here includes role, audience, task, format, constraints, examples — the six dimensions that drive answer quality.

Faster to a good first answer

A filled template lands a strong first answer ~3-5x more often than a blank prompt.

Consistent across the team

Shared templates mean shared output quality. Especially valuable for marketing, content and engineering teams.

Composable

Templates can be chained: outline template → draft template → critique template. Each step adds quality.

Model-agnostic

These templates work in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Mistral and Llama. The structure transfers across LLMs.

Optimizable

Paste a filled template into AI Prompt Fixer to adapt audience, voice and constraints to your exact case.

AI Prompt Templates FAQ

Common questions.

Yes, every template on this page is free to copy and use. There is no paywall, no signup, no license — use them in personal or commercial work.
Yes. The six-dimension structure is model-agnostic. For Claude-specific gains, paste the filled template into AI Prompt Fixer and it will adapt the prompt (e.g. wrap context in XML tags).
Yes. The templates are designed to be modified — that’s the point. Replace the bracketed variables, add or remove sections, and adapt to your domain.
Marketplaces (PromptHero, FlowGPT) curate user-submitted prompts of variable quality. This library is a small set of opinionated templates, each one structured around the same dimensions that drive output quality.
Monthly. We replace any template that underperforms based on user feedback and model changes (GPT-5, Claude 4, Gemini 2.5 releases all trigger a refresh).

Optimize your filled-in prompt template in one click.

Copy any template, replace the [variables], then paste it into the free AI Prompt Fixer to adapt it to your exact audience and voice.